5970 Shares

How would you summarize this article about Palin's Pipeline Project?

How would you summarize this article about Palin's Pipeline Project? Topic: How to write a good summary on a article
July 18, 2019 / By Iva
Question: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081026/ap_on_el_pr/palin_pipeline Would everyone *please* vote down answers, on either side of the aisle, that show the answerer didn't bother to read the article, or ignores the actual content of the article. I really want to see if I am getting a true picture of what's being reported, and I felt that some of the information was conflicting. I won't say what, though, because I don't want to influence the answers. Zudo, how about a summary of the article, not a play by play. I appreciate your effort and the attention to detail, but he question is about summarizing. How about a paragraph or two that does just that? Thanks! : )
Best Answer

Best Answers: How would you summarize this article about Palin's Pipeline Project?

Ella Ella | 4 days ago
That's much too long an article for YA people to read :-o Summary: Associated Press mixes editorial conjecture with facts; 'just asking questions'. It takes work to separate the opinionated conclusions from any facts written or broadcast since the news business realized it was competing with entertainment. Headlines are particularly misleading. Saying "the terms... benefited the winner" is an unfair, backwards look at the outcome. The bid that best matched the terms won. If they had any evidence the terms were created to match a particular bidder, that would be serious. They have none. "there's no guarantee the pipeline will ever be built" downplays the successful negotiation that went nowhere for years. "slanted the terms away from... energy giants" No. Straight-up denied them ownership of the pipeline, as later explained. Why this is a good or bad idea would be an interesting question. "Despite promises... had meetings or phone calls" Assumes corruption and no legitimate communication needed. Every oil company that does business up there has ties to "her administration" and all the government agencies they must deal with. The one they question as problematic is later fairly reported as having been brought into the open and resolved to the satisfaction of those accountable. But not to the satisfaction of the reporters, who don't display any comprehension of how things work. "Under a different set of rules four years earlier" Aaaannd? Then some good reporting with a minimum of innuendo. Testimonial: "I'm not saying..." Means: this is what i think, but can't show. The question, "what makes you think that?" either wasn't asked or didn't produce anything damning. Then focus on the winning bidder: "The Canadian giant had been pursuing an Alaska pipeline..." and other comments that could apply equally to the other contestants, but imply this was an inside job, without actually saying anything they would be sued over. And wrap it up with another "sweetheart" comment that isn't connected or explained to anything else. Nice. The AP summary in the first paragraph: "flawed bidding process that narrowed the field to a company with ties to her administration, an Associated Press investigation shows." never solidifies as flawed, uses 'narrowed' negatively when that's what it's supposed to do, and insinuates illegal conduct where none is found. --- Have you ever read an article in the papers on a subject you have some authority on? That's when you see the vast ineptitude from the group we rely on to inform us. They're good at human behavior, but rarely know the subject matter they're reporting on at all. --- The article has two intermingled narratives, the facts, and the opinions unsupported by the facts or conflicting with them. Which would you like summarized? There is little middle ground here and no way to unify them without disregarding large chunks of it. Perhaps starting with a particular point and working out from there would be a better question?
👍 176 | 👎 4
Did you like the answer? How would you summarize this article about Palin's Pipeline Project? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: How to write a good summary on a article


Ella Originally Answered: How would you summarize this article?
Summary: In the long race to develop stable commercial fusion reactors, the Chinese, using a Russian made Tokamak, set another record by increasing the time of the contained reaction to 3 seconds. The Chinese are now justly proud of joining the technological powers capable of advancing nuclear power, among whom are the French, Russians, Indians, Americans, and British. The task of making fusion commerially useful for electric power was started in 1950 with the Russian Tokamak, and then the American Stellerator. It will probably take another 20 or 30 years before a successful power plant is developed with this technology.
Ella Originally Answered: How would you summarize this article?
Fusion is safe if you use the right choice of fuel. The worst that could happen to people outside the plant is they breathe a little more helium and get higher voices. Trust me I do plasma physics for a living. The chinese merely copied something that has been built many times. They also never met fusion temperatures.
Ella Originally Answered: How would you summarize this article?
Well, being a 'get to the point' person, I still don't think I could summarize all the important words in this article. But, not one to quit easily, how about: 'China tested fusion on a level lower than Americans, but they plan to build dozens (REALLY? Dozens? They can't even feed their people!) of nuclear power plants to annoy the rest of the world trying to develop fusion. How's that?

Chrissie Chrissie
this is rarely corruption. remember she will basically set the bidding up and get in touch with around to work out what they are able to furnish. this is the legislative branch that makes the regulations an will pay for that. the concept that she could are transforming into to be extra bids is particularly fake. Governments everywhere in the U.S. have found few bidders for each form of projects. At one factor California theory their bidding replaced into some distance too low to charm to companies to do projects.the companies do not basically like the regulations so they don't bid. California could be getting extra bids now with the cave in and idle workers, yet in the process the housing growth they began comparable conferences that Palin made to get extra bidders. possibly the AP newshounds could have asked the l. a. circumstances approximately California bidding for projects. If California found 2 bidder they have been fortunate. some projects had purely one bidder at proper. What the AP newshounds could be incredibly staring at is Citizen amenities Inc., a front for ACORN the place Obama gave over $500,000 of that $800,000 for a service (lighting fixtures and sound) that neither CSI or ACORN furnish. additionally, how can a company whose basically existence is buried in ACORN and government paperwork additionally get $a million million extra from yet another resource? what share front businesses does ACORN have and is ACORN utilising those fronts as a slush fund for the Democratic occasion so as that ACORN can declare they are non partison to get government money whilst they genuine are not? this is what AP could incredibly be investigating. after all federal money are probable getting used to illegally decrease back the Democratic occasion and Obama and something of the Democrats know it because of the fact they are in on the scam.
👍 70 | 👎 -5

Chrissie Originally Answered: Can somebody please summarize this article for me?
I don't know what your biology background is but obviously if you are not very familiar with genomics, you will not have the base knowledge necessary to understand what they are doing in this paper. However, to sum up the main idea: The investigators looked at the entire genomes of patients affected with the neurodegenerative disease ALS. What they were looking for were regions of the patients' genomes that looked different from individuals who did not have ALS. In their study, they found that there are 10 particular regions in the genome that are often markedly different in those with ALS compared to those without it. Also they found a previously unidentified protein in which a single base pair difference in its sequence was found exclusively in ALS patients. If you have the correct background for the science, the paper is really just statistical. They show that it is simply more common to have these particular sequence differences in those people with disease. If you want to really understand what they did read the methods and pay attention to how they organized test subjects and how they interperited data. Here are some terms that may help you in figuring that out: Loci - a broad region of the genome that may contain several genes. Usually the genes within a loci are somehow related to one another SNP - single nucleotide polymorphisms. For a lot of our physical characteristics that vary widely from person to person, the basis for those difference an often be ascribed to single changes in one nucleotide. For example all the different hues of skin color are cause by single base pair differences scattered throughout the genes that produce skin pigments. These single base pair differences are called SNPs and can also confer disease susceptibility
Chrissie Originally Answered: Can somebody please summarize this article for me?
Print it off, read it slow, and take notes as you read. You might have to read it a couple times to get a solid understanding. Scientific/technical journals are hard to interpret until you get a grasp of the terms and techniques. It's a slow process but you gotta do it! Important things to consider when reading a scientific article are: 1) what hypothesis are they testing? 2) What experiments have they designed to test their hypothesis? 3) What did they find (results can be really hard to interpret if you are not well versed in statistics, but the authors will highlight and interpret their major findings in the discussion)? 4) How have the findings help to advance science/society? 5) What remains unknown or needs to be tested? You should be able to answer all of these questions when you are done reading the article.

If you have your own answer to the question how to write a good summary on a article, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.