Which is more common here: (a) pro-science posts containing alarmism, (b) anti-science posts containing deliberate deception about science?
Topic: Problem solving questions in science
May 25, 2019 / By Darnell Question:
Note, I am asking -in part (b) of this question- about posts on YA, Global Warming containing deception about CLIMATE SCIENCE, NOT the deception that pro-scientific consensus = (identical to) "alarmism."
Best Answers: Which is more common here: (a) pro-science posts containing alarmism, (b) anti-science posts containing deliberate deception about science?
Breda | 6 days ago
The only reason it's not 100%, blindingly clear what the answer is is that I'm not 100% sure how *deliberate* most of the denialist deceptions about science are. At least some of them genuinely believe the BS they spew, which suggests they are just wrong, not being deliberately deceptive.
But, yeah. Most of the pro-science posts are talking in calm, measured terms (eg "this is a problem we need to solve"), while a lot of the anti-science posts contain no significant relationship to reality.
👍 200 | 👎 6
Did you like the answer? Which is more common here: (a) pro-science posts containing alarmism, (b) anti-science posts containing deliberate deception about science?
Share with your friends
We found more questions related to the topic: Problem solving questions in science
Originally Answered: Can someone correct my science test? (9th grade science on elements and EM spectrum)?
1. carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, chlorine, and sulfur.
... The first three are elements; yes, they are chemicals, and one gets most plastics from petroleum (a specific kind of oil that gets extracted from rocks), but the question is specific -- it's asking for what chemicals (elements) compose most plastics.
2. a molecule composed of atoms with the same number of protons or a set of atoms with the same physical characteristics.
... that's a straight definition in Chemistry. The various elements are listed in the periodic table, which can be regarded as having 8 "blocks" of elements which have similar characteristics.
3. light ( wavelengths between red and violet)
The electromagnetic spectrum may consist of "physical waves" but our eyes (with which we see) only detect a very small part of the whole spectrum, from about 390 nanometres to about 700 nanometres; the complete spectrum can be regarded as going from extremely small ( less than 1 nanometre through to extremely long radio waves (in metres and even kilometres)
Pro-science posts contain the facts and if they are alarmist, so are Material Safety Data Sheets.
But the anti-science posts are full of claims that we will lose our freedoms or even our lives.
👍 80 | 👎 -3
Clearly the alarmists ARE the deniers. People that are pro-science tend to talk about things rationally, while those that aren't are always trotting out tabloid and blog headlines about some obscure, conjectured effect of climate change, or else telling us that fighting it will ruin the economy and turn the world into a giant communist state.
👍 75 | 👎 -12
Good point, Chem.
I note 'b" prevails, but many such deniers may be just uninformed dups of the Koch/fossil fuel propagandists.
👍 70 | 👎 -21
pegminer is spot on - people who base their every opinion on a belief in imaginary government-and profession-specific, political, and religious conspiracies all dedicated to the destruction of an equally imaginary theo-capitalism are the alarmists.
👍 65 | 👎 -30
Originally Answered: What is the diff between: social science, humanities, and science perspective?
Humanities are Social Science without using the Scientific Method or applying itself to the behavior of non-human animals. Social Science is Science, but it is applied to the behavior of humans, even though it can, on rare occassions, also apply to other animals. In many ways Social Science cannot be fully accounted for because of the many variables. Science is the study of nature through the Scientific Method. Everything is much more specific and goal oriented.
I hope this helps.