4013 Shares

Good articles for teaching about the democratic-republic form of government?

Good articles for teaching about the democratic-republic form of government? Topic: online article
July 15, 2019 / By Danielle
Question: I've been selected to teach an informal, not-for-credit crash course in politics. I decided that for the first few weeks' we will look at the democratic-republican (DR) form of government and discuss its history and why it has become the most popular model in modern society. The course will be mainly from an American perspective but international politics will be discussed whenever appropriate, including other variations on the DR model such as parliaments. What are some good online articles and printed books that would serve as literature for the content of such a course? The goal is to limit total reading/discussion/study time to 3-5 hours per week.
Best Answer

Best Answers: Good articles for teaching about the democratic-republic form of government?

Bonnie Bonnie | 4 days ago
that is often been a Democratic Republic. And Orwell grew to become into writing approximately English Socialism. (INGSOC) in 1984. additionally socialism in Europe in Animal Farm. The pigs have been the important celebration. a properly-liked Democracy does not be so good as one ought to think of. What if the majority desperate to vote some draconian rules into impression? human beings could be very merciless.
👍 176 | 👎 4
Did you like the answer? Good articles for teaching about the democratic-republic form of government? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: online article


Bonnie Originally Answered: Who Do You Think Has More Power-the president (republican or democrat) Or Democratic Congress?And Democratic?
I'm going to answer you as honestly as possible. I hope you can appreciate a viewpoint from the other side of the isle :) Please read, I want to answer your question respectfully. ========= The constitution is designed in such a way as to not give one branch too much power. That is the very essence of the separation of powers our forefathers wrote in articels 1, 2, and 3 of the Constitution (link below). For example, congress may narrowly pass a bill, say 52% yea - 48% nay, but a Presidential veto will send it back to congress, this time requiring a 66% yea. When democrats only hold a slight congressional majority (they held 51senate seats before the last election), it becomes increasingly hard to override a presidential veto because they then have to lobby republicans to vote in their favor. Can you imagine how hard it is for democrats having to lobby an additional 16% worth of republican support when they couldn't even get a single republican to support this last bill that passed yesterday? I'm not trying to make a case for one side or the other- all I'm saying is that the powers are divided. If one party only holds a slight majority (like the democrats did), the president will have more power. Now, if the democrats held a 2/3 majority in congress, then Congress would've had more power because they easily could've overridden a presidential veto. So to answer your question- it depends on the above. In this case, I would respectfully argue that the democrats majority wasn't big enough to override the president's vetos, therefore democrats couldn't get legislation passed, therefore you cannot blame them. It's not political bias- only fairness. Also- What did the democratic congress do to make the economy bad? Some would argue that republicans lifted the government regulations which protected foreclosure victims- those regulations were put in place after the great depression to "firewall" another great depression. Have you ever heard of Phil Gramm? He was McCain's economic adviser. He pushed through congress a major deregulation bill in 2000 which was a huge component in the mortgage meltdown. As you know- the housing crisis caused the credit crisis, which is causing the massive job losses today. If you really want the truth about who to blame, read this article. http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/07/foreclosure-phil.html === Look, my party has screwed up in the past, and I'll admit it. And not all republicans have bad ideas. But republican deregulation is probably more responsible this time around. Admitting that does not make you less of a republican- it just makes you able to hear both sides of the story. And that's the problem with the American political system today- no one wants to hear both sides of the story...don't you agree? hope this helped. Good luck
Bonnie Originally Answered: Who Do You Think Has More Power-the president (republican or democrat) Or Democratic Congress?And Democratic?
Republicans held a majority in both houses of Congress from 1995 until this most recent election, with the exception of an even Senate twice. Where is this Democratic Congress you speak of? Ahh.. yeah there was a Democratic majority in the House for the last two years. I missed that part. The Senate was still even. But you still can't claim that the "Democratic Congress" is the cause of the poor economy, or that they started the Iraq War. The war started in 2003, when the Senate was 51-48 in favor of Republicans (1 independent), and the House was 229-205 in favor of Republicans (1 independent). I find it funny how Republicans were furious at Democrats for opposing Bush's war plans, and now that the war is unpopular, Republicans are trying to blame Dems for it. Furthermore, a quick read of the Constitution would answer this for you. Remember hearing about "balance of powers" in elementary school?
Bonnie Originally Answered: Who Do You Think Has More Power-the president (republican or democrat) Or Democratic Congress?And Democratic?
certainly, i think of Michael Steele grow to be lieutenant governor of Maryland...whilst Bob Ehrlich grow to be governor. i think of he grow to be appointed as chairman to get extra Blacks interior the republican occasion. i can nevertheless see Steele distancing the republican occasion from Bush. and that i'm getting a kick out of him asserting Democrat innovations are incorrect...yet whilst asked what may be extra effective, he responds that's not his interest to state coverage. impressive As to Palin/Hillary...definite, i think of that grow to be their plan...Palin to replace Hillary. it rather is almost a Rolls Royce on your storage changing it with a tricycle. of course, the republicans merely don't get it. they have not have been given any empathy for what the persons have long undergone dropping jobs, properties, coverage, etc. All they care approximately is ability, controlling the persons with scare strategies...and money!

Bonnie Originally Answered: Do you think this form of Government, that I thought of, could somehow become corrupted & fail to achieve.?
one people start entering into these councils, they will see that they agree more on one issue then others do in different councils, and if they are the council "randomly" (idk how you do that) chosen then who to stop them from making an outlandish law that only that group agrees with. This would only cause more division and polarization as well making cause people to dislike even hate each other to the point were their olny purpose is to take the other group down. Plus you can make as many rule/laws as you want, its only when people fellow them is when they work
Bonnie Originally Answered: Do you think this form of Government, that I thought of, could somehow become corrupted & fail to achieve.?
in case you knew what you have been speaking approximately you realize that america isn't a democracy.....we are a republic. A democracy dies the 2d the electorate comprehend they might vote themselves $$$$ from the traditional public til. each thing you discribe are already regulations on the books NOW. somebody else already got here up with it.
Bonnie Originally Answered: Do you think this form of Government, that I thought of, could somehow become corrupted & fail to achieve.?
A randomly selected council that is not elected in or has any oversight committee checking them? Sounds like a recipe for corruption and a very powerful centralized rule. Umm, sounds likeā€¦.communism. No thanks.

If you have your own answer to the question online article, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.