Why should religion be eliminated from marriages?

Why should religion be eliminated from marriages? Topic: Religion essays
May 23, 2019 / By Elfrida
Question: I'm writing an essay in my Writing 122 course arguing that religion should be removed from marriages in the US because it would decrease divorce rates and (for once) completely separate church and state in that aspect. Are there any suggested sources I should use to find some solid statistical evidence? Does anyone have any counterarguments I need to address? Are there any other ideas for improving my argument and making it more supported? Anything is helpful...thanks.
Best Answer

Best Answers: Why should religion be eliminated from marriages?

Cheyenne Cheyenne | 7 days ago
Arguing against your statement - I think religion is an integral factor in marriage and should be recognized as such from the beginning. If you have people marrying from different faiths, they are going to have fundamental differences throughout their married life. Making them choose whether to have a wedding in his church, her church, or a civil service helps them to recognize the differences from the very start. The decision of where to marry could cause them to choose not to get married in the first place, or it could cause them to sit down and discuss their differences and how they will deal with those differences throughout their marriage. Then they are going into the marriage with their eyes wide open, and are less likely to fail in their marriage. Trying to make people ignore a fundamental part of themselves, be they Christian, Hindu or Atheist, when entering into a contract of marriage with another person is just asking for more problems down the road.
👍 162 | 👎 7
Did you like the answer? Why should religion be eliminated from marriages? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Religion essays

Cheyenne Originally Answered: What are some essay ideas for why religion should be eliminated from marriage?
Well, if it wasnt for religion, there would be no such thing as marriage in the first place......It is a union blessed by God based on religious principles. For all people who believe in God, then there will always be marriages because they live by the Law of God. If Government was to outlaw marriage, then the Bill of Rights would not be worth the paper it is written on. The Government would be no more than a dictatorship, dividing the American people into believers and non-believers. The believers will always believe in marriage, so does that mean the Government would charge people of Godly faith to spend time in jail or pay a fine if they choose to get married? It wouldnt work unless the Government wanted civil war. Maybe instead of removing marriage all together, it may be better to give an alternative to marriage. Maybe the non-believers could have a contract, that can be renewed every 2 years if they choose to live in a committed relationship. Maybe the only way the separate the Church and the State is to have two Governments....one who supports Godly beliefs, and one who doesnt. It would be pretty chaotic and would cost the taxpayers zillions in setting up a new form of government. The State will never be separate from the Church because the Bill of Rights says that all people are allowed to believe whatever they want as long as it doesnt take away another person's rights. It would never work. I think you are going to have a pretty tough case to present, unless you work out a way how the American People can retain their rights in abolishing marriage. If marriage is to be abolished, then people's rights in general will be abolished. You cant abolish marriage unless you outlaw Religions.

Aspen Aspen
Religion is evil-- government would be more than oppressive enough WITH a 'Wall of Separation' (which no country has ever really had). The asker has a great point that any religion in legally binding marriage ceremonies is blatantly unconstitutional. 'Church weddings' display the fact that traditional rituals continue to be officially recongised. To be frank, there is only one (lame) excuse to get married: to make your relationship "legitimate" in the eyes of either a deity or a government... and religion will always be used as an excuse to discriminate, whether it's Christians barring homosexuals or Environmentalists putting down omnivores!
👍 60 | 👎 6

Aaren Aaren
i think of the belief is to allow for gay marriage. As i'm valuable you're conscious, many religious leaders have condemned homosexuality in all its varieties and have taken a stand syaing that it truly isn't any longer appropriate for 2 adult men or 2 women to be married. If the religious component have been bumped off, then it may be an argument of only making an allowance for a union between 2 consenting adults to be married and recognised decrease than the regulation as such. i think of the seperation of religion from state is mandatory in removing alot of prejudices, and it truly isn't any longer an exception. Kudos on takin in the form of debatable undertaking, and stable success inclusive of your paper.
👍 54 | 👎 5

Solomon Solomon
A marriage should be made in the social environment of the couple getting wed. If they are members of a church then it is natural for them to marry within the framework of their belief structure, with fellow believers in support. As we do not have a strong religious belief, we enjoyed a civil ceremony in the company of friends and relatives. It does not seem right to attend church only for weddings and funerals, others won't agree but to me it is not a sincere way to start the committed relationship which is marriage. A promise is a promise whether you make it in a church or not.
👍 48 | 👎 4

Solomon Originally Answered: Why are arranged marriages so popular in Asia? Why did arranged marriages die out in the U.S (West)?
An arranged marriage is a marriage in which neither the bride nor the groom has any official say over the selection of their future spouses. However, in an arranged marriage, both parties give full consent to the marriage. Arranged marriages have been a successful traditional aspect of family life in many cultures for many years. Also known as Pragmatic marriage. In South Asia arranged marriages is mostly preferred. Some intellectuals contend that Arranged Marriages also prevent social mobility. Parents, relatives and other clan elders in their search for the right match inevitably end up pairing individuals from—more or less--the same economic background. Deviations from established practices are not common. As a result arranged marriages are doubly biased against darker and poorer men and women. By preventing social mobility this form of match making also reinforces the status quo within the society. Consequently, established unjust social practices--maltreatment of women, children and other ethnic and religious minorities, for example--remain unchallenged within the society. Society’s every thought, word and action becomes subjective: It conforms to the popular view. In short, people are afraid of rocking the boat; they do not want to end up as pariahs. The proponents of Arranged Marriages often tout the low rates of divorce. It is the lack of expectation from your future spouse that makes Arranged Marriages resilient, they contend. Since both the man and the woman do not know each other before marriage, the proponents aver, they accept any or all the qualities of their spouse as manna from heaven. This is blatant sophistry! Arranged Marriages are frequently practiced in societies, which do not give equal rights to their female population. In such paternalistic societies women are confined to the household or allowed to hold only socially secluded and insignificant jobs. Arranged Marriages are forced upon them and they coerced into living their lives as second-class citizens in their own country. The real reason for the low rate of divorce is that women are forced to compromise and made to accept maltreatment in societies where Arranged Marriages are practiced. Divorced women do not have access to any moral or financial support systems. Frequently, their own families refuse to accept them back. In such societies, women’s place can only be defined through the men they are related to: A woman is born a daughter. She grows up as a sister. Later on, she becomes someone’s wife and a few years later someone’s mother. In a nutshell, women do not have an independent status in communities where Arranged Marriages are the norm. If non-Western societies aspire to become freer and more just--like counterparts in the West--they must start with a trenchant critique of their practices. It is high time nations realized that giving equal rights—social and political influence, for example--to one half of their population, i.e. women, will go a long way in solving prevalent social problems. America was based on freedom and individuality; as a result it is not at all shocking to see that Arranged marriages are greatly misunderstood because they feel that it is against everything freedom stands for. Looking at the path Americans has chosen to live a happy married life is disappointing. Mostly everyone seems to be a victim of so called Cinderella syndrome. This is represented in movies and television sitcoms such as ‘Friends’, where they have displayed women at the age of 30 still waiting for “Mr. Right” and men divorced more then once, because they later realize what they thought was love was merely physical attraction. About the statistics of divorce rates in arranged marriages, all I can say about South Asia is that out of 100 marriages only maximum 10 would fail and 5 end-up in divorce. So, it is around 5% (no scientific data). About the demography of data on Arranged Marriage (also my guess works): 1. Africa: 70% 2. America: 5% 3. Bangladesh: 85% 4. India: 75% 5. Iran: 60% 6. Iraq: (No idea) 7. Pakistan: 90% About why arranged marriages died out in the U.S. I have an analogy to make, without being rude or judgmental about the perception of women in our society, which is a bit unbalanced and I may be the target of criticism by the equal rights proponents. Please read the following example for reason of easy understanding only. The Indenting Agents all over the world, once-upon-a-time was the only bridge between Manufacturers and End-users of products and services to be sold, bought or exchanged. This is the period after WW-II till the 90s. However, with the spread and availability of information technology and its easy use by the end-users by way of cheaper Radio, TV sets, Telex machines (obsolete now), Fax machines, Desktop computers, Internet, Mobile Phones, Websites, Blog posting etc., both Buyer and Seller of products and services have come to know each other thoroughly before they can make a deal. This has eliminated the role of middlemen (Agents) by about 50% who were working as the ‘matchmaker’ in business for many years. Hence, most of the business people are getting first hand authentic information quickly on products and services available with price, deliver schedule etc., and can make up their mind quickly based on scientific data. The same thing is also working in social life and these so-called matchmakers’ days have already been finished in western societies and being numbered in developing countries and people are now contacting each other directly and may prefer for having 30-days free-trail before the purchase, or return the goods within its trial period (lol). In fine, my personal view would be that (without any prejudice or causing any devaluation of human values) have the provision of DPI-Direct Proforma Invoice (no need to have Agent) issued and make all the negotiation by yourself being the end-user or supplier/manufacturer (whichever the case may be) and then at final stage engage the PSI-Pre-shipment Inspection company either at port-of-shipment or on-arrival at your port for checking if the offer matched with actual cargo so that one need not to return-the-goods or services (divorce) or hold-back the payment or deduct penalty for non-fulfillment of contract, in case of L/C (downgrade the wife with maltreatment etc.) Have a nice study and would like to have a copy of your result, if possible.

If you have your own answer to the question religion essays, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.