Nature in religion: nature for use by humans vs. humans must look after nature? (Shinto, the Bible)?

Nature in religion: nature for use by humans vs. humans must look after nature? (Shinto, the Bible)? Topic: Research papers on environmental science
June 17, 2019 / By Chalice
Question: So I wrote this persuasive research paper on Bushido for a class and decided that I don't like it. The paper is due on Thursday, but I have to meet my instructor at 4:00 PM to go over my draft. I decided that instead I'd like to talk about Shinto (and also syncretism in Japan, but with a focus on Shinto). One of the things I will be talking about is the importance that Shinto places on nature. In contrast, I want to show other religions that have different views. In an anthropology class I took ages ago my instructor said something about religions that take the view that nature is there for humans to use, versus other religions that see nature as something to just exist alongside with, and/or look after. Are there terms for this? Also, this may be far reaching, but is there anything in the Bible (or text from another religion, I'm not too picky) that's about using nature, or man's right to do with it as we see fit or something? Just trying to get together a quick draft, heh. Much appreciated, if anyone can help a bit.
Best Answer

Best Answers: Nature in religion: nature for use by humans vs. humans must look after nature? (Shinto, the Bible)?

Annora Annora | 8 days ago
this might help The Christian Environmental Ethic A true Christian environmental ethic differs from the naturalistic and pantheistic ethics in that it is based on the reality of God as Creator and man as his image-bearer and steward. God is the Creator of nature, not part of nature. He transcends nature (Gen. 1-2; Job 38-41; Ps. 19, 24, and 104; Rom 1:18-20; Col. 1:16-17). All of nature, including man, is equal in its origin. Nature has value in and of itself because God created it. Nature's value is intrinsic; it will not change because the fact of its creation will not change. The rock, the tree, and the cat deserve our respect because God made them to be as they are. While man is a creature and therefore is identified with the other creatures, he is also created in God's image. It is this image that separates humans from the rest of creation (Gen. 1:26-27; Ps. 139:13-16). God did not bestow His image anywhere else in nature. Therefore, while a cat has value because God created it, it is inappropriate to romanticize the cat as though it had human emotions. All God's creatures glorify Him by their very existence, but only one is able to worship and serve Him by an act of the will. But a responsibility goes along with bearing the image of God. In its proper sense, man's rule and dominion over the earth is that of a steward or a caretaker, not a reckless exploiter. Man is not sovereign over the lower orders of creation. Ownership is in the hands of the Lord. God told Adam and Eve to cultivate and keep the garden (Gen. 2:15), and we may certainly use nature for our benefit, but we may only use it as God intends. An effective steward understands that which he oversees, and science can help us discover the intricacies of nature. Technology puts the creation to man's use, but unnecessary waste and pollution degrades it and spoils the creation's ability to give glorify to its creator. I think it is helpful to realize that we are to exercise dominion over nature not as though we are entitled to exploit it but as something borrowed or held in trust. Recall that in the parable of the talents in Matthew 25, the steward who merely buried his talent out of fear of losing it was severely chastised. What little he did have was taken away and given to those who already had a great deal. When Christ returns, His earth may well be handed back to Him rusted, corroded, polluted, and ugly. To what degree will you or I be held responsible?
👍 264 | 👎 8
Did you like the answer? Nature in religion: nature for use by humans vs. humans must look after nature? (Shinto, the Bible)? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Research papers on environmental science

Annora Originally Answered: Themes on humans nature (how we are)?
They look for patterns: Links to the past, similarities, etc. They fight their nature - We forget we're instinctual animals just like "secondary animals". For example, if I murdered someone's child. That parent wouldn't use their evolved speech patterns to tell me how they feel. They will use their fists. Selfish to the core: People want validation - Creating kids (showing off parenting skills), Relationships, Love ( You really want some one to love you. And you love them, because they love you).
Annora Originally Answered: Themes on humans nature (how we are)?
Humans are individual social activities whose nature is to generate and multiply. The rest is simply the most complex thing. Coordinating with what individuals have generated and multiplied. It is natural for humans to coordinate with what has been created and that is what we do now. Coordinate with reality the best we know how to do. That is our nature. Survive with each other in the least and thrive with each other in the most.

York York
"The ancient Japanese considered that all things of this world have their own spirituality. Therefore, the relationship between the natural environment of this world and people is that of blood kin, like the bond between brother and sister." "Shinto sees nature as the divinity itself." "So, Shinto suggests that we should shift our point of view and look at our environment with the spirit of “reverence and gratitude,” that is, with the spirit of parental care for children or with the spirit of brotherhood. " We are all connected, even to the land. Therefore, we have a responsibility to use it wisely and nurture it always.
👍 110 | 👎 7

York Originally Answered: Humans lost touch with nature?
People do not farm anymore. In our Grandparents days 89% of Americans were farmers. Raised there own food. People don't even have gardens in their back yard anymore. People do not hunt and fish for their food. If they did they would not be so wasteful. My G-Pa and G-Ma knew all the different trees. I can ask someone today is that a Dogwood or is that a Hackberry and they for the most part haven't even heard of those. And simple children do not even play outside anymore. It is a shame.
York Originally Answered: Humans lost touch with nature?
Nature can be hard on us so I think these divisions are necessary but I also think we need to make an effort to commune with nature (probably why ppl go camping). We don't really hunt very much any more...

If you have your own answer to the question research papers on environmental science, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.